The Rise of AI in Personal Finance: A Closer Look at Its Strengths and Shortcomings

In 2025, many Americans are turning to AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini for financial advice, aiming to enhance their savings and manage personal finances. While these AI platforms can offer quick information on budgeting and credit improvement, experts caution against relying on them for complex financial decisions.

Andrew Lo, director of the Laboratory for Financial Engineering at MIT Sloan School of Management, warns that seeking advice from AI in areas like finance, law, or medicine can be risky due to potential inaccuracies and lack of personalized insight.

Despite these concerns, a 2024 Experian study found that 47% of Americans have used or considered using AI chatbots for financial management, with 96% reporting positive experiences. Platforms such as Perplexity and ChatGPT assist users with saving, budgeting, investment planning, and credit score improvement, serving as accessible starting points for those unable to afford professional financial advice.

However, users should exercise caution. AI platforms can produce “hallucinations,” offering advice not grounded in best practices or personal financial realities. Additionally, sharing personal financial details with AI platforms raises privacy concerns, as it’s unclear how this information is stored or used in training AI models.

Generative AI platforms are rapidly advancing, but their potential for inaccuracies remains a concern. For instance, ChatGPT has been noted to fabricate sources to support its responses, which could mislead users in making financial decisions.

Moreover, AI platforms may not disclose conflicts of interest. For example, when ChatGPT recommends investing in companies like Microsoft, it doesn’t mention Microsoft’s significant investment in OpenAI, ChatGPT’s parent company, unless specifically prompted.

Human financial advisors offer personalized, conversation-based planning, considering individual financial statuses and goals to create tailored plans that account for potential risks. In contrast, AI provides advice based on limited details, which may lead individuals to make costly mistakes if they don’t consider their full financial picture.

As AI technology evolves, it may become more integrated into financial advising. Michael Donnelly of the CFP Board suggests that financial professionals who embrace AI as a tool for practice management can enhance efficiency and client relationships. However, he emphasizes that AI won’t replace the need for human advisors, especially for personalized guidance.

Andrew Lo advocates for implementing guardrails to ensure AI’s safe use in finance, including investor education, built-in safeguards in AI models, and regulatory measures to prevent misuse. He compares the situation to existing regulations that limit access to high-risk financial products, suggesting similar oversight for AI in financial advising.

In conclusion, while AI can assist with basic financial advice, it lacks the personalized insight and regulatory oversight necessary for complex financial planning. Individuals should approach AI-generated financial advice with caution and consider consulting human advisors for comprehensive financial guidance.

Disclaimer – Our editorial team has thoroughly fact-checked this article to ensure its accuracy and eliminate any potential misinformation. We are dedicated to upholding the highest standards of integrity in our content.

About The Author